Mixing Bowl Fun

Matthew’s quickly-advancing motor skills and increased mobility have definitely brought some new challenges.  I am overdue for a post demonstrating all of his new skills . . . he’s just so hard to keep up with these days!

Whenever Matthew is awake, he is in a constant “seek and destroy” mode.  He spends his day knocking things down, throwing things,  “bamming” objects together (or on walls, big brother, etc) getting into brother’s toys or mommy’s cupboards, and exploring anything and everything.  He has earned himself a new nickname around our house:

Matthew the Menace!

sdc10195

This morning, I was trying to keep him occupied so I could load the dishwasher.  The dishwasher is his favorite thing, though – if it is open at all, he can pull the door down, climb up on the door, grab dishes and throw them on the kitchen floor.  And, he’s fast!

But, this morning my “tupperware” cupboard was open, so Matthew had something new to explore and destroy:

sdc10228

I didn’t stop him, because he was having so much fun!  (And, he was letting me load the dishwasher!)  He reminded me of another little boy who used to love to play with my mixing bowls:

sdc10231

Micah used to spend hours spinning my bowls.  He tried to teach Matthew, who caught on quickly but threw the bowls instead of spinning them.  That’s when Micah decided “hats” would be a better game.  Thanks, big brother, for teaching me all kinds of new, fun things!

sdc10235

. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

When I was trying to get Matthew to look at me for one of these pictures, Micah helped:  “Maffew, say ‘make a mess!‘”

Advertisements

Ending Abortion

“Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them.” Ephesians 5:11

On today’s date in 1973, the US Supreme Court ruled on Roe v. Wade, legalizing abortion in the United States.  The pro-abortion movement can seem so strong and powerful at times, it is tempting to throw our hands in the air and say, “What can we possibly do about this?”  However, there is quite a bit we can do to win the fight for life, and the other side is not as strong as they seem.

Fr. Frank Pavone, National Director of Priests for Life, has written an excellent Plan to End Abortion.  I am including the full text of his article below, but you can also visit the link to download, print, and share your own copies.

The entire piece is worth reading, but there are a couple of his points I wanted to specifically mention.

First, the pro-life warriors need to unite – to present a solid, coordinated effort to win the battle.  The anti-life movement is very united and very organized, and we need to be as well.

Secondly, while working to change abortion legislation is important, a lot will need to change before laws will change.  Our goal need to be not just to make abortion illegal, but to make it “unavailable, unnecessary, and unthinkable.”  Before any laws will change, abortion needs to become far less common and less socially acceptable.  Fr. Pavone offers practical suggestions to make this happen.

It is time to take action.  Over 44 million babies have been killed since 1973.  Today, 93% of parents who receive a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome will abort their baby.  I don’t know what I’m going to say to my children when they hear and understand the implications of this . . . how do I explain to Micah and Matthew that 93% of other parents would rather kill their child than have a child like Matthew?  I worry not only for our family, but for our entire society.  What are we doing to ourselves?

Fr. Pavone also wrote a book, Ending Abortion, in which he suggests that we can all lead by our example.  If you believe life is precious from the moment of conception, then be careful to treat a pregnancy and talk about a pregnancy as a precious, whole life from the very beginning.  I know . . . you think you already do . . . but Fr. Pavone caught me here.   The language we are so accustomed to using to refer to a pregnancy often implies something other than full life:

“Do you have one on the way?”   – Actually, the life is already here, just not born yet.

“How many kids do you have . . . 2 1/2?”   – So, a pregnancy is only 1/2 a life??

“The baby is coming in June.”  -Coming?  That implies he’s not here yet . . . but he is!

Fr. Pavone suggests that parents celebrate and name their unborn baby as soon as possible, and refer to him or her by name (or, if gender is unknown, by 2 names??) as much as possible.  Once a person has a name, he or she becomes much more “real” to others.  Just being careful about the language we use and the way we refer to life in the womb can make a big impact . . . but it takes practice.  I am going to really have to work on not saying “one on the way,” because I tend to use that phrase a lot!  He made me think about the practice of waiting 3 months to announce a pregnancy, too.  I understand why some people do, especially if they have suffered a miscarriage in the past, but if we are trying to tell the world that life is precious and worthy of celebrating from the moment of conception, maybe we need to celebrate it from the moment we know the child exists, too!

The website, www.abortionfacts.com is also an excellent resource, and offers some simple things we can all do to help end abortion:

  1. Pray for an end to abortion
  2. Wear the “Precious Feet” pin.  It is the exact size and shape of an unborn baby’s feet at 10 weeks.
  3. Volunteer your time with pro-life groups or pregnancy care centers
  4. Support these groups financially
  5. Start a pro-life group at your church.
  6. Share your convictions with your children and grandchildren
  7. Donate pro-life books, videos, or fetal models to local libraries and schools.
  8. Participate in pro-life events being held in your community.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Plan to End Abortion

(We invite the input of pro-life leaders and activists in regard to this outline of a plan to end abortion, so that together we can put together a comprehensive approach to achieve our goal once and for all. Please share your comments at www.ProLifeStrategy.com – Fr. Frank Pavone, National Director, Priests for Life)

Introduction

On the day after Roe vs. Wade (1973) no child in the womb had legal protection from abortion. In 2008, no child in the womb has legal protection from abortion. While there has been some movement of public opinion in our direction, we are in the midst of a long deadlock in the attitudes of the American people, which can best be described as “conflicted.”

Many strategies have been developed, and a multitude of projects have been implemented, but the overall effect has been less than the sum of the parts, either because the strategies are not comprehensive enough to take account of the many dynamics at work in the abortion movement and the pro-life movement, or because the implementation does not coordinate the various aspects of the movement, or simply because sufficient resources of people and money are lacking.

An overall, comprehensive plan is needed for the pro-life movement. This is not the same as a merger of groups or having one group in charge. Rather, it is an effort to map the dynamics of the pro-life movement, to identify those activities which have the best strategic effect, to describe how the various activities interrelate with one another, and to obtain the funds and personnel necessary for
those activities.

Summary of Strategic Elements

In order to bring about an end to abortion in this country, three things are needed: 1) an overall strategy backed up by research and experience; 2) a detailed plan which transforms the strategy into concrete steps with goals and deadlines; and 3) the resources to implement that plan.

The strategic plan described here takes account of 1) the laws of supply and demand as they apply to the business of abortion, 2) what research reveals about the current conflicted attitude of the American people regarding abortion, and 3) the many and varied activities of the pro-life movement with a view toward what seems to be working and what elements of the movement can support other elements, while avoiding artificial “mergers” of groups.

Abortion continues because of a) supply: the existence of a half-billion dollar a year industry providing abortions, b) demand: some 3500 requests daily for legal abortions, and c) license: the fact that this activity is legally permitted and protected, reinforced by various laws and court decisions not only allowing abortion but introducing obstacles to those who try to stop it.

These three aspects are closely related, and one key manner in which they are related is that the money obtained by the abortionist is in large measure directed toward the efforts to keep it legal and to produce the propaganda of the “prochoice” movement. A significant “momentum” is thus generated in terms of the flow of money and the influence it produces in the realms of government, media, and education. To slow this momentum, the source of its power needs to be
cut off, namely, the incredibly high numbers of abortions. Only after the actual numbers are brought down can the fundamental license of abortion be changed.

The pro-life movement from the beginning has primarily sought to change the laws. While that is always an essential aspect of the task at hand, primary attention needs to be directed to the ways in which abortions can be stopped before the law changes. Moreover, the pro-life movement needs to use its strengths against the abortion industry’s weaknesses. Those weaknesses are primarily in the area of supply and the manner in which abortions are carried out.

The goal of the pro-life movement is not simply to make abortion illegal. That is one aspect of the whole effort. The goal is to make it unavailable, unnecessary, and unthinkable. This requires drying up the supply of abortionists, strengthening the effectiveness of alternatives to abortion, and resolving the conflict in the attitudes of the American people, many of whom admit that abortion is murder but believe it needs to be available anyway.

Strategic Elements of Plan to End Abortion

1. Supply  (Abortionists and Abortion Mills)

This is the weak spot of the abortion industry, in terms of the number of people we are dealing with and the vulnerability of those people. Numerous admissions by the abortion industry indicate that it cannot carry out its work because of “a turn-off of physicians coming into this field” (Abortionist Ed Boaz, speaking on ABC World News Tonight, January 16, 1998).

The number of abortion facilities in the US has decreased by over 50% since the early ‘90’s. It is further evident that when women do not have easy access to abortion, they tend to bring the child to birth rather than undergo difficult measures to obtain an abortion elsewhere. In short, fewer abortionists means fewer abortions, and this creates a more realistic situation for changing the laws.

We can contribute to the “supply” problem by playing up the incurable stigma of “abortion” and “abortionists”, exposing the corrupt practices within the industry, and using legal and judicial recourse to force places closed and abortionists out of business.

The bottom line is that the abortion-supporters may be left with a nation in which the act of abortion is fully supported by the government, but there is nobody to perform the procedure.

Specific Initiatives:

• Abortion Malpractice Litigation: Abortion is legal but malpractice is not. Within abortion clinics nationwide, not only is there rampant medical malpractice, but there are many other violations of the law that have been uncovered, ranging from sexual abuse to failure to report statutory rape to violation of OSHA standards.  Through education of law enforcement, legislators, and the general public on
the violations that occur in these clinics can bring about action to shut them down, even as abortion remains legal all the while.

• Legislation aimed at making it harder for abortions to stay in business needs to be passed. Proposals can be accepted and pursued strictly on the basis of ensuring the rights, health, and safety of women, which is the very basis on which “pro-choice” advocates claim to stand, and increasing the accountability of abortionists for their actions, an accountability explicitly referred to by Roe vs. Wade.. These proposals create significant opportunities for advances in public relations, and a dilemma for abortion supporters, who have to now choose between their support for the abortion industry and their support for women (which they usually present as one and the same). States that have
passed regulations for abortion facilities have been largely successful in their efforts to defend those laws in court challenges.

• Constant presence at the mills, and at homes and businesses of the providers. This presence reinforces the stigma attached to abortion. This stigma needs to be used to keep medical students out of the abortion business and to pressure second and third-level abortionists to leave the industry.
• Legal assistance for those who engage in the peaceful activity, and not
allowing the “false target” strategy of the pro-aborts keep people from doing what the courts explicitly allow. The “false target” strategy is that by which pro-abortion forces accuse peaceful protestors of doing what they never did, and hence tainting their image in the public mind, so that people do not want to join them even for constitutionally protected activities.

• Dialogue and Reconciliation. Besides pushing the abortionists out by means of lawsuits and other pressure, we need to provide them a place to land, as well as use the approach of dialogue to persuade them to stop. Along these lines, efforts of dialogue and friendship have proven fruitful and should be promoted, with appropriate training programs. Thousands are leaving or on the brink of leaving the abortion industry. The Society of Centurions has been established, both nationally and internationally. This group, for former providers, both assists people to come out of the industry, and to find healing once they have come out. It is an effort that should likewise be made known and strengthened.

2.  Demand  (Abortion-minded women and men)

In regard to “demand”, alternatives to abortion have to be strengthened, in terms of the quality of the help offered and our ability to get the message out. Women do not get abortions because of “freedom of choice,” but precisely because they feel they have no freedom and no choice. Many women, when presented with real
alternatives, will choose life for their children.

Others, despite the presence of help to get through a pregnancy, are only interested in help to get out of the pregnancy. They too need to be reached and shown that abortion is far more horrifying than any of their fears about the alternatives.

The current number of abortions is largely explained by the fact that the abortion industry is reaching these women before the pro-life movement has a chance to alert them to the horrors of — and the alternatives to — abortion.

It is noteworthy that in 1992, when the Supreme Court reaffirmed Roe vs. Wade by the Planned Parenthood vs. Casey decision, the Court essentially said that even if Roe was wrongly decided, so many women have abortions that it is unrealistic to put a stop to it now. This, along with the reasoning of many legislators, reinforces the need to bring the numbers down before changing the law. This involves reaching the abortion-minded woman. Efforts which can correct this situation and which need to be strengthened and publicized include the following:

• Gabriel Project: This is an effort to fully activate Churches of all
denominations to a) announce to the community that alternatives to abortion are available through the local congregation; and b) mobilize a team of volunteers to coordinate the concrete response of that congregation to women who come forward for assistance. This effort works hand-in-hand with pregnancy assistance centers, rather than replacing them. Effort is successful in several parts of the nation but not yet widely known.

• Media campaigns: Groups such as the Caring Foundation and others have developed a set of professional television ads that make use of important marketing research and expertise, and appeal to the experience of the woman who is tempted to have an abortion or has already had one, and to the conflicted attitudes of most of the American people on this subject. Studies done in the communities where these ads have aired show a consistent and significant reduction in the numbers of abortions and a shift in public opinion on the issue.
• Upgrade CPCs to Pregnancy Assistance Medical Clinics. While there are more pregnancy assistance centers in the nation than there are abortion facilities, they are often unable to attract abortion-minded women because they are unable to offer medical diagnoses. The National Institute for Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA), however, has studied, developed, and implemented the task of upgrading centers  to the status of medical clinics. Evidence indicates that this effort brings more abortion-minded women to these facilities, and hence uses their resources for the primary goal of reducing the numbers of abortions.

• Increase funding for Pregnancy Assistance Centers. Planned Parenthood, the largest single abortion-provider in the US, receives one-third of its total revenue from government grants and contracts. At the same time, however, the nation’s crisis pregnancy centers, maternity homes, and adoption agencies rely on contributions from concerned citizens to run their shoe-string budgets. Various bills have been introduced to begin directing funding to the pregnancy centers. The pro-life movement needs to continue and publicize such legislative initiatives.
• Sharing the testimonies of women. Pro-abortion forces have always made use of the testimonies of those who claim to “need” abortion for their emotionally wrenching circumstances. Yet testimonies of those who suffer from a past abortion are far more plentiful. The Silent No More Awareness Campaign and Operation Outcry are the two major avenues by which such testimonies are shared in public, organized ways. Such testimonies can be used for educational material, speakers’ bureaus, and legislative initiatives. The work of gathering this information needs immediate and sustained assistance.

• Strengthen presence at the mills: It is one thing to go to abortion mills to reach out to women on their way in; it is quite another to receive effective training in the methods that work best. A number of initiatives are assisting to both bring out large numbers of people to abortion mills, and to train them to carry out that presence effectively. The 40 Days for Life Campaigns have done this with great success. Likewise, the Helpers of God’s Precious Infants  consistently attract large crowds at abortion mills.
• Legislative effort on state levels that place Court-sanctioned curbs on abortion. Initiatives like this have mushroomed in recent years because they enjoy wide popular support, and they lead to a decrease in the numbers of abortion. This includes efforts such as parental involvement laws, informed consent, and waiting periods. There is real momentum on the state level, and it is growing every year. Moreover, formal studies have demonstrated how state legislation has been a key factor in the reduction of the overall numbers of abortions in America.

3. License (The abortion procedure is legal in our nation.)

To effect change in this area requires reaching and persuading many more people than do the previous two areas. To change the law, abortion has to become less common (as explained above) and less socially acceptable. The following section deals with strategies and activities for changing the public opinion about abortion.

Opinion polls of the American people on abortion show a deep conflict. The picture is captured by a CBS/NY Times poll which asked, “Is abortion the same thing as murdering a child…?”, to which 50% of the respondents said YES. Of this group, the question was then asked, “Do you agree or disagree that abortion is sometimes the best course in a bad situation?” Those who said yes were 32%.

A growing number of people call abortion murder but think it should still be available. They have heard the message from both sides: the pro-life movement has convinced them that the child is a child and that abortion destroys that child. The pro-choice movement has convinced them that such destruction is a necessary evil. Both sides have won, but on different battlegrounds. It is time for the pro-life movement to take and win the battleground on which the pro-choice movementstands.

We cannot presume that the conclusion, “Abortion is murder,” automatically leads people to say, “Well, then, it can’t be permitted.” Rather than the end point of the moral analysis, the conclusion “Abortion is murder” is for many people only the first step of a moral analysis that involves the weighing of values: i.e. the value of the unborn child and the values at stake for the pregnant mother. The reason many think abortion, though murder, needs to be kept legal and
available is that they believe a) there are no alternatives, and b) the abortion provides a benefit to the mother.

The pro-life movement must therefore stress a) the existence of the alternatives, and the fact that the pro-life movement consists primarily in the effort to develop and provide those alternatives; b) the growing evidence that what harms the baby always harms the mother as well.

This does not mean we stop working to persuade the people that abortion is the killing of a child. It means, rather, that we show the full truth of the evil of abortion, that it harms both mother and child, and that we re-frame the question as “Why can’t we love them both?”

A further revelation from opinion studies shows that many people are
uncomfortable with the timing and the ease (legally speaking) with which abortions can be obtained. We should obviously, therefore, be focusing on this theme in our educational efforts.

A key factor in molding public opinion, furthermore, is the image most people have of the pro-life and pro-abortion movements.

The image of the pro-life movement certainly needs to be changed.

• Publicizing the alternatives to abortion
• Publicizing the fact that healing and forgiveness are available to all who have been involved in any way in an abortion
• Fostering dialogue
• Allowing the voices of abortion survivors and former abortion providers to be heard
• Promoting a wider spectrum of voices, such as Democrats for Life, Feminists for Life, and the many non-religious groups
• Professionalizing the movement: instituting deadlines, upgrading the quality of materials, and using good business practices

Likewise, the image of the abortion industry has to be changed.

• Expose its corrupt practices and point out how far its positions are from those of most Americans

Practical programs that can implement the above points include the following: • Post abortion Ministry (Rachel’s Vineyard, Project Rachel, and numerous other ministries) The post-abortion aspects of pro-life work strengthen all of the above in a number of ways.

1) They show the public that abortion is not the benefit for women or society that they thought it was.
2) They strengthen the stigma of abortion and challenge the notion that providers may have that they are helping women.
3) They speak directly to abortion-minded people about what they are getting into.
4) They call out for better regulation of the abortion industry.

Specific post-abortion areas to strengthen include:

• Fund more research so that we can scientifically measure and defend what we already know to be happening, and present it through the academic, media, educational, and government channels…
• Legal challenges to Roe based on the harm done to women.
• Public relations efforts to invite post-abortive women to repentance and healing. These are occasionally conducted in various cities already.

Other points of implementation for public education include:

• The lessons taught by laws already passed like the Unborn Victims of Violence Act , and laws not passed, like the Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act increase the “cognitive dissonance” in the public mind regarding the status of the unborn child.
• The Endowment for Human Development (www.ehd.org) has produced a DVD that has been adopted by National Geographic with the most striking video footage in existence of the first trimester unborn child, along with the most carefully researched and up to date medical commentary on the imagery. The plan for the distribution of this material to our school systems deserves support.
• D and E educational campaign — Just as images of partial-birth abortion moved public opinion away from support of abortion-on-demand, so now similar images of D&E will likewise continue to affect public opinion. The visual depiction of violence of abortion in images and videos is unparalleled in its power to awaken the conscience.
• Educational campaign simply on the reasons abortions are performed (using pro-abortion sources).

• Large momentum of state-level activity, putting various publicly favored restrictions on abortion that actually bring the numbers down.

Training

A lot of information and good advice exists for would-be pro-life activists. This info needs to be more systematically presented in good training seminars that are not limited to the interests of one or another particular group. The development of online training is critical.

4.  Activation of the Churches for all of the above

After summarizing the work he and his colleagues did to launch the abortion industry, Dr. Bernard Nathanson has said to the clergy, “We would never have gotten away with what we did if you had been united, purposeful, and strong.” The pro-abortion forces still know that the biggest obstacle in their way is the Church of Jesus Christ. Only the Church has the Divine guarantee that it will conquer the Culture of Death.

Given its vast system of communication, and the fact that those attending church regularly are statistically the most likely to be pro-life and therefore to do something about it, on a natural level alone it is evident that all that the pro-life movement wants to do will benefit, and in fact stands in need of, the resources that can be generated from the members of the Church.

Combining this with the supernatural gifts of truth and grace which belong to the Church, it is clear that the full activation of the Church is a critical step for ending abortion. This does not primarily mean creating new structures. It simply means infusing the existing structure with greater vigor and effectiveness.

Specific Initiatives to focus on:

Seminars for Clergy, seminarians, and pastoral ministers presented by specially trained clergy who travel to parishes, schools, and pro-life groups throughout the nation. (This is the main work being done by Priests for Life.)

Similar activity can be done in other Christian denominations through fostering the growth of the National Pro-life Religious Council.

Freedom of Choice Act

The first thing I’d do as President is sign the Freedom of Choice Act.  That’s the first thing I’d do.”  -President-elect Barak Obama

So . . . just what is the Freedom of Choice Act (FOCA), and what would it do?

FOCA is a piece of legislation that would eliminate every restriction on abortion nationwide.  If FOCA is passed into law,

  • all restrictions on abortions will be lifted
  • partial birth abortion will again be legal
  • parental notification laws will be nullified, meaning a 12 or 13 year old girl could have an abortion without her parent’s knowledge or consent!
  • more taxpayer dollars will fund abortions
  • faith-based hospitals and facilities will be forced to perform abortions, or face huge penalties
  • eliminates health and safety regulations for abortion clinics
  • state laws restricting or regulating abortions will not longer be valid
  • establishes a fundamental right for abortion, similar to our right to free speech or our right to vote.
  • restricts information of abortion risks and alternatives to be given to women considering abortion
  • restricts funding for pro-life or abortion-alternative organizations

Is this really the kind of change the majority of Americans are hoping to see?  I truly don’t think it is.

Denise Burke, President of Americans United for Life, has written an excellent analysis of the legislation.  Read it here

FOCA supporters would like you to believe that this is legislation that his healthy for women – protecting our rights, freedoms, and equality.  However, eliminating common-sense laws such as parental notification, waiting periods, and safety regulations for clinics is NOT healthy or good for women. 

Denise Burke, President of Americans United for Life, has written an excellent analysis of the legislation – read it here.  To learn more, or to add your name to the “Fight FOCA” petition, visit the Fight FOCA website.

And . . . FOCA is not the only piece of legislation to be pushed in the upcoming months.  Also watch out for the Prevention First Act.  You can read up on it, and keep up to date on other anti-life legislation at the Americans United for Life Action web site.

So . . . what can we do?    Stay tuned . . . I have more posts coming.

National Sanctity of Human Life Day, 2009

Update:  To hear us tell Matthew’s story, go to the West Side Baptist Church website.  Click on “Sermons,” then click on “hear audio” for the January 18th sermon titled “Drifters.”

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Yesterday was National Sanctity of Human Life Day, a day, declared by President Bush, set aside to “recognize that each person, including every person waiting to be born, has a special place and purpose in this world.”

We had the honor of sharing Matthew’s story during church services yesterday.  It went very well, and was well received and appreciated.  Matthew did his part by putting on a great show while we were talking – waving, smiling, doing his “Soooo Big,” and doing everything he could to grab the microphone!  During the second service, the congregation broke out into applause when I talked about his miraculous healing.  Matthew knew everyone was clapping for him (because, aren’t they always?), and clapped right along.  It was great.  Afterwards, many people expressed their appreciation to us, and of course, stopped us to say just how CUTE Matthew is!

This week, I want to share some more posts regarding the sanctity of life.  For now, here is the full text of President Bush’s proclamation.  We have appreciated so much having a leader willing to stand up for human life.   As a new administration takes office, the fight for life is going to need more warriors, a united front, and renewed strength.

National Sanctity of Human Life Day, 2009
A Proclamation by the President of the United States of America

All human life is a gift from our Creator that is sacred, unique, and worthy of protection. On National Sanctity of Human Life Day, our country recognizes that each person, including every person waiting to be born, has a special place and purpose in this world. We also underscore our dedication to heeding this message of conscience by speaking up for the weak and voiceless among us.

The most basic duty of government is to protect the life of the innocent. My Administration has been committed to building a culture of life by vigorously promoting adoption and parental notification laws, opposing Federal funding for abortions overseas, encouraging teen abstinence, and funding crisis pregnancy programs. In 2002, I was honored to sign into law the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, which extends legal protection to children who survive an abortion attempt. I signed legislation in 2003 to ban the cruel practice of partial-birth abortion, and that law represents our commitment to building a culture of life in America. Also, I was proud to sign the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004, which allows authorities to charge a person who causes death or injury to a child in the womb with a separate offense in addition to any charges relating to the mother.

America is a caring Nation, and our values should guide us as we harness the gifts of science. In our zeal for new treatments and cures, we must never abandon our fundamental morals. We can achieve the great breakthroughs we all seek with reverence for the gift of life.

The sanctity of life is written in the hearts of all men and women. On this day and throughout the year, we aspire to build a society in which every child is welcome in life and protected in law. We also encourage more of our fellow Americans to join our just and noble cause. History tells us that with a cause rooted in our deepest principles and appealing to the best instincts of our citizens, we will prevail.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim January 18, 2009, as National Sanctity of Human Life Day. I call upon all Americans to recognize this day with appropriate ceremonies and to underscore our commitment to respecting and protecting the life and dignity of every human being.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifteenth day of January, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.

GEORGE W. BUSH

Another Good Cardiology Follow-Up

Matthew had an appointment with Dr. Anderson yesterday, which went very well. His echocardiogram looked great, and from here on out he will just have annual follow-ups. Getting him to hold still for the echo was a little interesting, although he really did very well. Dr. Anderson always calls him the “miracle boy,” and expresses his amazement at how well he’s doing.

Thanks, Dr. Anderson!

Matthew’s Debut

We have been asked to share Matthew’s story at church this Sunday, which is Sanctity of Human Life Sunday.

We are thrilled to have an opportunity to tell so many people about Matthew’s miraculous healing, and to share how precious he his to us and how grateful we are for the gift of life in him.  I have the feeling this is only the beginning . . . the first of many times we’ll be sharing this story!

My prayers are these:

  • that we will know what parts of the story are especially important to share (we have about 5 minutes to speak, and I want to use them wisely.)
  • that we make it clear that God has ALL the Glory for Matthew’s healing.  It wasn’t that the doctors were wrong . . . it was that God had different plans for Matthew!
  • that we can share his story in an uplifting, encouraging way
  • that Matthew’s story will help others realize the intrinsic value of every human life

Will you also please pray for our time this Sunday?  I would, once again, appreciate the prayer-cover.

We will be speaking at West Side Baptist* church on Summitview Ave. in Yakima at their 9:00 and 10:45 services.

*Since I am Catholic and Aaron is not, we attend both West Side Baptist and St. Paul’s Cathedral in Yakima.